翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ The Jewellery Channel ・ The Jewelry Exchange ・ The Jewels ・ The Jewels of Aptor ・ The Jewess and the Captain ・ The Jewess of Toledo ・ The Jewess of Toledo (film) ・ The Jewish 100 ・ The Jewish Advocate ・ The Jewish Americans ・ The Jewish Bride ・ The Jewish Cemetery ・ The Jewish Channel ・ The Jewish Chronicle ・ The Jewish Chronicle of Pittsburgh ・ The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway ・ The Jewish Exponent ・ The Jewish Home ・ The Jewish Journal ・ The Jewish Journal (Boston North) ・ The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles ・ The Jewish Mind ・ The Jewish News (newspaper) ・ The Jewish Observer ・ The Jewish Observer (Los Angeles) ・ The Jewish Post & News ・ The Jewish Press ・ The Jewish Quarterly Review ・ The Jewish Question ・ The Jewish Spy Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway ： ウィキペディア英語版 The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway (Communication No. 30/2003) was a case decided by the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination in 2005. ==Facts== In 2000, a group known as the "Bootboys" organized a march in commemoration of Rudolf Hess, near Oslo. There was an antisemitic speech by the march's leader Terje Sjølie, the Nazi salute was made and "Sieg Heil" shouted. Some witnesses filed a complaint with the police, and Sjølie was charged with a violation of section 135a of the Norwegian Penal Code (threatening, insulting, or subjecting to hatred, persecution or contempt, any person or group of persons because of their creed, race, color or national or ethnic origin). He was initially acquitted by the Halden City Court, then convicted by the Borgarting Court of Appeal, and finally acquitted again by the Supreme Court in an 11:6 decision on 17 December 2002. The Supreme Court found that penalizing approval of Nazism would involve prohibiting Nazi organizations, which it considered would go too far and be incompatible with the right to freedom of speech. The majority held that the speech contained derogatory and offensive remarks, but that no actual threats were made, nor any instructions to carry out any particular actions. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.